Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorWeckerly, Floyd W.
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Katherine Ellen ( )
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-20T15:43:51Z
dc.date.available2020-08-20T15:43:51Z
dc.date.issued2006-08
dc.identifier.citationRichardson, K. E. (2006). Social incompatibility, alarm state, and sexual segregation in urban white-tailed deer (Unpublished thesis). Texas State University-San Marcos, San Marcos, Texas.
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/12445
dc.description.abstractSexual segregation is prevalent among sexually dimorphic ruminants outside the mating season and no consensus has yet been reached to explain this phenomenon. Differential reactions to predation risk or sexual differences in aggression may be responsible for sexual segregation. I investigated how male and female white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) segregated in an urban environment. Two routes in San Marcos, Texas were surveyed from a vehicle at dawn and dusk for one year. Segregation was examined at the group level, at two spatial scales (groups within 300 or 600 m) and by amount of cover used (< 50 %, or > 50 %). Alarm response to the vehicle was measured for each group. Focal animal sampling was used to measure the time males and females spent within one body length of each other and the number of aggressions within one body length. Males and females were segregated in winter and spring but segregation declined throughout the summer, a trend previously unrecorded. Spatial segregation followed a similar trend. Akaike information criterion model selection indicated that alarm response was related to group size and group composition. Larger groups were less alarmed and female groups were less alarmed when controlled for group size. Females generally used larger groups than males outside of parturition. Males were further apart and more aggressive than females. The difference in group sizes between the sexes indicated that males and females used different avoidance strategies, preventing aggregation of the sexes. This is likely due to the more aggressive nature of males. Predation risk and social incompatibility may both contribute to sexual segregation.
dc.formatText
dc.format.extent43 pages
dc.format.medium1 file (.pdf)
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectWhite-tailed deer
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectSexual dimorphism
dc.titleSocial incompatibility, alarm state, and sexual segregation in urban white-tailed deer
txstate.documenttypeThesis
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSimpson, T. Randy
dc.contributor.committeeMemberOtt, James
dc.contributor.committeeMemberGreen, M. Clay
thesis.degree.departmentBiology
thesis.degree.grantorTexas State University--San Marcos
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science
txstate.accessrestricted
txstate.departmentBiology


Download

This item is restricted to the Texas State University community. TXST affiliated users can access the item with their NetID and password authentication. Non-affiliated individuals should request a copy through their local library’s interlibrary loan service.

If this is your thesis or dissertation, you can make it open access. This will allow all visitors to view the document. To request open access, fill out the form linked below:

https://www.library.txstate.edu/research/digital-collections/Request-Open-Access.html

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record