The Four Domain Food Insecurity Scale (4D-FIS): Development and evaluation of a complementary food insecurity measure
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, Cassandra M. ( ![]() | |
dc.contributor.author | Ammerman, Alice S. ( ![]() | |
dc.contributor.author | Adair, Linda S. ( ) | |
dc.contributor.author | Aiello, Allison E. ( ![]() | |
dc.contributor.author | Flax, Valerie L. ( ![]() | |
dc.contributor.author | Elliott, Sinikka ( ) | |
dc.contributor.author | Hardison-Moody, Annie ( ![]() | |
dc.contributor.author | Bowen, Sarah K. ( ![]() | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-11T21:36:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-11T21:36:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Johnson, C. M., Ammerman, A. S., Adair, L. S., Aiello, A. E., Flax, V. L., Elliott, S., Hardison-Moody, A., & Bowen, S. K. (2020). The four domain food insecurity scale (4D-FIS): Development and evaluation of a complementary food insecurity measure. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 10(6), pp. 1249-1580. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1869-6716 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/13101 | |
dc.description.abstract | The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Security Survey Module (FSSM) is a valuable tool for measuring food insecurity, but it has limitations for capturing experiences of less severe food insecurity. To develop and test the Four Domain Food Insecurity Scale (4D-FIS), a complementary measure designed to assess all four domains of the food access dimension of food insecurity (quantitative, qualitative, psychological, and social).Low-income Black, Latina, and White women (n = 109) completed semi-structured (qualitative) and structured (quantitative) interviews. Interviewers separately administered two food insecurity scales, including the 4D-FIS and the USDA FSSM adult scale. A scoring protocol was developed to determine food insecurity status with the 4D-FIS. Analyses included a confirmatory factor analysis to examine the hypothesized structure of the 4D-FIS and an initial evaluation of reliability and validity. A four-factor model fit the data reasonably well as judged with fit indices. Results showed relatively high factor loadings and inter-factor correlations indicated that factors were distinct. Cronbach’s alpha (ɑ) for the overall scale was 0.90 (subscale ɑ ranged from 0.69 to 0.91) and provided support for the scale’s internal consistency reliability. There was fair overall agreement between the 4D-FIS and USDA FSSM adult scale, but agreement varied by category. Findings provide preliminary support for the 4D-FIS as a complementary measure of food insecurity, with implications for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers working in U.S. communities. | en_US |
dc.format | Text | |
dc.format.extent | 11 pages | |
dc.format.medium | 1 file (.pdf) | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | en_US |
dc.source | Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2020, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp. 1249-1580. | |
dc.subject | Food insecurity | en_US |
dc.subject | Food supply | en_US |
dc.subject | Hunger | en_US |
dc.subject | Nutrition surveys | en_US |
dc.subject | Women | en_US |
dc.subject | Vulnerable populations | en_US |
dc.title | The Four Domain Food Insecurity Scale (4D-FIS): Development and evaluation of a complementary food insecurity measure | en_US |
dc.type | publishedVersion | |
txstate.documenttype | Article | |
dc.rights.holder | © 2021 The Author(s). | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaa125 | |
dc.rights.license | ![]() This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. | |
dc.description.department | Family and Consumer Sciences |