dc.contributor.author | Abraham, Nisha ( ) | |
dc.contributor.author | Kamath Telang, Nina ( ) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-22T21:35:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-22T21:35:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-08-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abraham, N., & Kamath Telang, N. (2020). Implementing collaborative mock exam review. Journal of College and Academic Support Programs, 3(1), pp. 50-52. | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/15547 | |
dc.description.abstract | Exam reviews are a common offering within and
across courses, often supported by departments,
learning centers, and success centers. However,
the majority of typical exam review formats follow
the lecture or direct-teach format, with instructor-
centered re-teaching or problem-solving as the
mode of review. In lieu of this traditional and more
passive offering, Balch (1998) found that students of
all academic ability benefitted from active practice
exam reviews and outperformed those who participated
in typical exam reviews. In these active practice
exam reviews, students spend time in the review
actively solving problems, developing solutions and
answering exam-style questions rather than passively
receiving answers or watching an expert solve question Cranney et al. (2009) also saw positive gains in
student outcomes based on the testing effect of repeated
quizzing and testing, as opposed to re-study. | en_US |
dc.format | Text | |
dc.format.extent | 3 pages | |
dc.format.medium | 1 file (.pdf) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Texas State University, The Education Institute | |
dc.source | Journal of College Academic Support Programs, Spring/Summer 2020, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 50-52. | |
dc.subject | Exam review | en_US |
dc.subject | Student support | en_US |
dc.subject | Promising practice | en_US |
dc.subject | Information retrieval | en_US |
dc.title | Implementing Collaborative Mock Exam Review | en_US |
dc.type | publishedVersion | |
txstate.documenttype | Article | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.36896/3.1pp2 | |