Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBryan, Deborah ( )en_US
dc.contributor.authorCurran, Joanna ( Orcid Icon 0000-0002-4011-2803 )en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-01-18T10:06:37Z
dc.date.available2012-02-24T10:06:33Z
dc.date.issued2004-01-18en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/2854
dc.descriptionResearch Enhancement Program Final Reports.
dc.description.abstractThis project examined the applicability of two of the most common models used in hydrological modeling today: ArcHydro (ArcGIS Hydro Data Model) and SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) model. The models are similar in that each advertises itself as a watershed model with an interface to GlS. The models differ in their choice of governing equations and the way each deals with actual data that may be collected in the watershed. The purpose of the proposed research was to determine which model provided the best representation of a watershed. Data was collected for the Blanco and Guadalupe watersheds and imported into each model. Once the models were run, the results were compared to actual field data to test the accuracy of the models and ease of use. Both models permitted us to simultaneously study various parameters acting on the watersheds. The SWAT model allowed the researchers to incorporate more physical data than the ArcHydro model, resulting in a more accurate depiction of the watershed, especially for smaller watersheds like the Blanco. ArcHydro excels at data management, making it a better choice when large amounts of data need to be collected and included in the model (such as with larger watersheds like the Guadalupe). We found that SWAT better replicates field information. In addition, it allows the researcher more control over the physical processes being modeled. SWAT is easier to use for researchers with little GIS experience. However, for those researchers with GIS programming capabilities, ArcHydro is more flexible.en_US
dc.formatText
dc.format.extent1 page
dc.format.medium1 file (.pdf)
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectArc Hydroen_US
dc.subjectSWATen_US
dc.subjectBlanco watersheden_US
dc.subjectGuadalupe watersheden_US
dc.subjectGISen_US
dc.titleComparison of Arc Hydro and SWAT models used in watershed analysisen_US
txstate.documenttypeResearch Report


Download

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record