Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShields, Patricia M. ( Orcid Icon 0000-0002-0960-4869 )
dc.date.accessioned2007-06-27T14:54:30Z
dc.date.available2012-02-24T10:20:01Z
dc.date.issued2005-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationShields, P. M. (2005). Classical pragmatism does not need an upgrade: lessons for public administration. Administration and Society, 37(4), pp. 504-518.
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/3975
dc.description.abstractIn 2003, Administration and Society published Patricia Shields's "The Community of Inquiry: Classical Pragmatism and Public Administration." Shortly thereafter, Hugh Miller responded with "Old Pragmatism Needs and Upgrade" in the Disputatio Sine Fine section of Administration & Society. He argued that scholars like Shields, Evans, and Snider should incorporate the ideas of Richard Rorty into their scholarship. Miller's article was followed by a series of 9 essays debating the merits of Dewey and Rorty for public administration. This article summarizes the debate and argues that Classical Pragmatism does not need an upgrade.en_US
dc.formatText
dc.format.extent25 pages
dc.format.medium1 file (.pdf)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage
dc.sourceAdministration and Society, 2005, Vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 504-518.
dc.subjectClassical pragmatismen_US
dc.subjectPublic Administrationen_US
dc.subjectDeweyen_US
dc.subjectRortyen_US
dc.titleClassical Pragmatism Does Not Need an Upgrade: Lessons for Public Administrationen_US
dc.typepublishedVersion
txstate.documenttypeArticle
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705278351
txstate.departmentPolitical Science


Download

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record