Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJo, Injeong
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jinhee
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-21T14:44:41Z
dc.date.available2017-08-21T14:44:41Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-21
dc.date.submittedAugust 2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/6751
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation aims to develop a reliable and valid assessment tool to measure students’ Learning Progression (LP) on map understanding, identify Korean students’ LP on map understanding, and examine whether there is consistency between the identified LP and current geography curriculum in Korea. The Map Understanding Test (MUT) was developed based on a hypothesized LP on map understanding derived from previous studies. Results from a pilot study and the current study supported the reliability and validity of the MUT as measure of LP. The test was conducted with 1,486 Korean elementary, middle, high school, and college students using the MUT. The MUT consisted of six ordered multiple-choice items, and the response choices aligned with hypothesized ordering of LP. Rasch model was used to statistically analyze the test data via the software package ConstructMap. Wright Maps aligned with hypothesized ordering of the LP and older students scored at higher levels, suggesting a developmental progression. The identified LP based on cross-sectional research showed a common developmental sequence in map understanding. Abilities related to Orientation, Location, and Distance are considered relatively easy whereas abilities related to Scale, Contour lines, and Map projection are considered to be relatively difficult to learn. Other useful insights for developing an effective curriculum were found to be students’ proficiency in map understanding and misconceptions. Lastly, comparison between the identified LP and current geography curriculum in Korea provided several suggestions in curriculum revision. The current geography curriculum in Korea has limitations in sequencing learning contents as well as stating learning objectives explicitly. These results have significance in designing assessments to measure LP, accumulation of knowledge in map learning, and providing empirical evidence refining current curriculum and associated materials for map learning.
dc.formatText
dc.format.extent180 pages
dc.format.medium1 file (.pdf)
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectGeography education
dc.subjectLearning progression
dc.subjectMap understanding
dc.subjectMap elements
dc.subjectCurriculum development
dc.subjectGeography curriculum in Korea
dc.subject.lcshEducational psychologyen_US
dc.subject.lcshGeography--Study and teaching--Korea (South)en_US
dc.titleLearning Progressions on Map Understanding: A case study of elementary through college students in Korea
txstate.documenttypeThesis
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMuniz-Solari, Osvaldo
dc.contributor.committeeMemberChow, Edwin
dc.contributor.committeeMemberAcee, Taylor
thesis.degree.departmentGeography
thesis.degree.disciplineGeographic Education
thesis.degree.grantorTexas State University
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy
txstate.departmentGeography


Download

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record