Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFife, Paul C. ( )
dc.contributor.authorPenrose, Oliver ( )
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-22T19:58:34Z
dc.date.available2018-08-22T19:58:34Z
dc.date.issued1995-02-24
dc.identifier.citationFife, P. C. & Penrose, O. (1995). Interfacial dynamics for thermodynamically consistent phase-field models with nonconserved order parameter. Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, 1995(16), pp. 1-49.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1072-6691
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/7579
dc.description.abstract

We study certain approximate solutions of a system of equations formulated in an earlier paper (Physica D 43 44–62 (1990)) which in dimensionless form are

ut + γw(ϕ)t = ∇2u,
α∊2ϕt = ∊22 ϕ + F (ϕ, u),

where u is (dimensionless) temperature, ϕ is an order parameter, w(ϕ) is the temperature–independent part of the energy density, and F involves the ϕ–derivative of the free-energy density. The constants α and γ are of order 1 or smaller, whereas ∊ could be as small as 10−8. Assuming that a solution has two single–phase regions separated by a moving phase boundary Γ(t), we obtain the differential equations and boundary conditions satisfied by the ‘outer’ solution valid in the sense of formal asymptotics away from Γ and the ‘inner’ solution valid close to Γ. Both first and second order transitions are treated. In the former case, the ‘outer’ solution obeys a free boundary problem for the heat equations with a Stefan–like condition expressing conservation of energy at the interface and another condition relating the velocity of the interface to its curvature, the surface tension and the local temperature. There are O(∊) effects not present in the standard phase–field model, e.g. a correction to the Stefan condition due to stretching of the interface. For second–order transitions, the main new effect is a term proportional to the temperature gradient in the equation for the interfacial velocity. This effect is related to the dependence of surface tension on temperature.

We also consider some cases in which the temperature u is very small, and possibly γ or α as well; these lead to further free boundary problems, which have already been noted for the standard phase-field model, but which are now given a different interpretation and derivation.

Finally, we consider two cases going beyond the formulation in the above equations. In one, the thermal conductivity is enhanced (to order O(∊−1)) within the interface, leading to an extra term in the Stefan condition proportional (in two dimensions) to the second derivative of curvature with respect to arc length. In the other, the order parameter has m components, leading naturally to anisotropies in the interface conditions.

en_US
dc.formatText
dc.format.extent49 pages
dc.format.medium1 file (.pdf)
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSouthwest Texas State University, Department of Mathematicsen_US
dc.sourceElectronic Journal of Differential Equations, 1995, San Marcos, Texas: Southwest Texas State University and University of North Texas.
dc.subjectIntegro-differential equationen_US
dc.subjectStrong solutionen_US
dc.subjectSingular kernelen_US
dc.subjectQuasilinearen_US
dc.titleInterfacial Dynamics for Thermodynamically Consistent Phase-Field Models with Nonconserved Order Parameteren_US
txstate.documenttypeArticle
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Download

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record