Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenavidez, Kathryn M.
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Trina
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Madison
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, David
dc.contributor.authorVeech, Joseph A.
dc.contributor.authorHahn, Dittmar
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorSoltero, Fred V.
dc.contributor.authorPerez Ramirez, Alejandro E.
dc.contributor.authorPerez de Leon, Adalberto
dc.contributor.authorCastro-Arellano, Ivan
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-30T16:01:16Z
dc.date.available2019-07-30T16:01:16Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationBenavidez KM, Guerra T, Torres M, Rodriguez D, Veech JA, et al. (2019) The Prevalence of Leptospira among Invasive Small Mammals on Puerto Rican Cattle Farms. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 13(5): e0007236en_US
dc.identifier.issn1935-2735
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/8418
dc.description.abstractLeptospirosis, an emerging infectious disease caused by bacteria of the genus Leptospira, is thought to be the most widespread zoonotic disease in the world. A first step in preventing the spread of Leptospira is delineating the animal reservoirs that maintain and disperse the bacteria. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods targeting the LipL32 gene were used to analyze kidney samples from 124 House mice (Mus musculus), 94 Black rats (Rattus rattus), 5 Norway rats (R. norvegicus), and 89 small Indian mongooses (Herpestes auropunctatus) from five cattle farms in Puerto Rico. Renal carriage of Leptospira was found in 38% of the sampled individuals, with 59% of the sampled mice, 34% of Black rats, 20% of Norway rats, and 13% of the mongooses. A heterogeneous distribution of prevalence was also found among sites, with the highest prevalence of Leptospira-positive samples at 52% and the lowest at 30%. Comparative sequence analysis of the LipL32 gene from positive samples revealed the presence of two species of Leptospira, L. borgpetersenii and L. interrogans in mice, detected in similar percentages in samples from four farms, while samples from the fifth farm almost exclusively harbored L. interrogans. In rats, both Leptospira species were found, while mongooses only harbored L. interrogans. Numbers tested for both animals, however, were too small (n = 7 each) to relate prevalence of Leptospira species to location. Significant associations of Leptospira prevalence with anthropogenic landscape features were observed at farms in Naguabo and Sabana Grande, where infected individuals were closer to human dwellings, milking barns, and ponds than were uninfected individuals. These results show that rural areas of Puerto Rico are in need of management and longitudinal surveillance of Leptospira in order to prevent continued infection of focal susceptible species (i.e. humans and cattle).en_US
dc.formatText
dc.format.extent16 pages
dc.format.medium1 file (.pdf)
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_US
dc.sourcePLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2019, Vol. 13, No. 5, e0007236
dc.subjectLeptospirosis
dc.subjectInfectious disease
dc.subjectLipL32 gene
dc.titleThe Prevalence of Leptospira among Invasive Small Mammals on Puerto Rican Cattle Farms.en_US
txstate.documenttypeArticle
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007236
txstate.departmentBiology


Download

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record