Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKotarba, Joseph A. ( )
dc.contributor.authorWooten, Kevin ( )
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-27T13:03:30Z
dc.date.available2019-08-27T13:03:30Z
dc.date.issued2017-11
dc.identifier.citationKotarba, J. A., & Wooten, K. (2017). The innovation scorecard for continuous improvement applied to translational science. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 1(5), pp. 296–300.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2059-8661
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/8547
dc.description.abstract

Introduction: This paper reports on the baseline stage of a qualitative evaluation of the application of the Innovative Scorecard (ISC) to the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) at the University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) at Galveston. The ISC is adopted from the established Balanced Scorecard system for strategic planning and performance management. In formulating the evaluation, we focused on the organizational identity literature.

Methods: The initial evaluation consisted of a series of semi-structured interviews with 22 participants of the ISC Boot Camp conducted in July 2015.

Results: The logic of grounded theory pointed to the clustering of perceptions of the ISC around respondents' occupational locations at UTMB. Administrators anticipate the expansion of planning activities to include a wider range of participants under the current CTSA award period (2015-2020) than under our first CTSA approval period (2009-2014). A common viewpoint among the senior scientists was that the scientific value of their work will continue to speak for itself without requiring the language of business. Junior scientists looked forward to the ISC's emphasis on increasingly horizontal leadership that will give them more access to and more control over their work and resources. Postdocs and senior staff welcomed increased involvement in the total research process at UTMB.

Conclusion: The report concludes with strategies for future follow-up.

en_US
dc.formatText
dc.format.extent5 pages
dc.format.medium1 file (.pdf)
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAssociation for Clinical and Translational Science
dc.sourceJournal of Clinical and Translational Science, 2017, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 296–300.
dc.subjectTranslational scienceen_US
dc.subjectClinical and translational science award
dc.subjectInnovation scorecard
dc.subjectOrganizational identity
dc.subjectQualitative evaluation
dc.titleThe Innovation Scorecard for Continuous Improvement Applied to Translational Scienceen_US
txstate.documenttypeArticle
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.297
dc.rights.licenseThis is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited.
txstate.departmentSociology


Download

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record