Examining Predictors of Myocardial Infarction

dc.contributor.authorDolezel, Diane
dc.contributor.authorMcLeod, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorFulton, Lawrence V.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-14T19:37:55Z
dc.date.available2022-11-14T19:37:55Z
dc.date.issued10/27/2021
dc.description.abstractCardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death in the United States. This study analyzed predictors of myocardial infarction (MI) for those aged 35 and older based on demographic, socioeconomic, geographic, behavioral, and risk factors, as well as access to healthcare variables using the Center for Disease (CDC) Control Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey for the year 2019. Multiple quasibinomial models were generated on an 80% training set hierarchically and then used to forecast the 20% test set. The final training model proved somewhat capable of prediction with a weighted F1-Score = 0.898. A complete model based on statistically significant variables using the entirety of the dataset was compared to the same model built on the training set. Models demonstrated coefficient stability. Similar to previous studies, age, gender, marital status, veteran status, income, home ownership, employment status, and education level were important demographic and socioeconomic predictors. The only geographic variable that remained in the model was associated with the West North Central Census Division (in-creased risk). Statistically important behavioral and risk factors as well as comorbidities included health status, smoking, alcohol consumption frequency, cholesterol, blood pressure, diabetes, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), kidney disease, and arthritis. Three access to healthcare variables proved statistically significant: lack of a primary care provider (Odds Ratio, OR = 0.853, p < 0.001), cost considerations prevented some care (OR = 1.232, p < 0.001), and lack of an annual checkup (OR = 0.807, p < 0.001). The directionality of these odds ratios is congruent with a marginal effects model and implies that those without MI are more likely not to have a primary provider or annual checkup, but those with MI are more likely to have missed care due to the cost of that care. Cost of healthcare for MI patients is associated with not receiving care after accounting for all other variables.
dc.description.departmentHealth Informatics and Information Management
dc.description.departmentComputer Information Systems and Quantitative Methods
dc.description.departmentHealth Administration
dc.formatText
dc.format.extent19 pages
dc.format.medium1 file (.pdf)
dc.identifier.citationDolezel, D., McLeod, A., & Fulton, L. (2021). Examining predictors of myocardial infarction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(21), 11284.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111284
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10877/16299
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, Vol. 18, No. 21, Article 11284, pp. 1-19.
dc.subjectmyocardial infarction
dc.subjectprediction
dc.subjectcardiovascular
dc.subjectHealth Administration
dc.titleExamining Predictors of Myocardial Infarction
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ijerph-18-11284.pdf
Size:
3.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.54 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: