The Biggest Myth in Spatial Econometrics

dc.contributor.authorLeSage, James P.
dc.contributor.authorPace, R. Kelley
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-01T13:36:51Z
dc.date.available2021-07-01T13:36:51Z
dc.date.issued2014-12
dc.description.abstractThere is near universal agreement that estimates and inferences from spatial regression models are sensitive to particular specifications used for the spatial weight structure in these models. We find little theoretical basis for this commonly held belief, if estimates and inferences are based on the true partial derivatives for a well-specified spatial regression model. We conclude that this myth may have arisen from past applied work that incorrectly interpreted the model coefficients as if they were partial derivatives, or from use of misspecified models.
dc.description.departmentFinance and Economics
dc.formatText
dc.format.extent33 pages
dc.format.medium1 file (.pdf)
dc.identifier.citationLeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2014). The biggest myth in spatial econometrics. Econometrics, 2(4), pp. 217-249.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics2040217
dc.identifier.issn2225-1146
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10877/13799
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
dc.rights.holder© 2014 The Authors.
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
dc.sourceEconometrics, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 217-249.
dc.subjectindirect effects
dc.subjectspatial regression estimates
dc.subjectsensitivity to spatial weights
dc.titleThe Biggest Myth in Spatial Econometrics
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
econometrics-02-00217.pdf
Size:
402.99 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.54 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: