A State Between: A Caring-Virtuosic Argument Considering Decision-Making Before Wartime
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yuan, Lijun | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kirby, Ryan Patrick | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-05-23T14:28:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-05-23T14:28:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-05 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This dissertation attempts to illumine concepts used to deescalate warring measures designed to protect a nation-State, offered by traditional justice ethics, by synthesizing those ethics with the ethics of care. Because ancient, justice-based ethics were derived while moralizing the virtuosic roles that imply interdependency, and, more relatively, protection, it is imperative that we examine what war-measure contributions seem to be overshadowed in ethical decision-making affecting the community-at-large through virtue and care. In suggesting ideas for warring measures to be contemplated based on evaluating the protective human state of nature within the community-at-large, I expand on the intermediary caring state of nature existing between the extremes of Lockean-Hobbesian social contract theses. Considering views that are compatible with foremost just-war theories, I argue that our original state of nature is not absolutely cruel and not absolutely utopic, but originally engrossed in a sort of compulsive protection of community members, exhibiting traits of both care and virtue under differently-carried habits of protection. In regard to arguing a contest to a caring ontology, ideas of the caring-relational being is used to measure the question of how we ought to go about warring while simultaneously active in a society implementing a protective state of nature. The position of war being ethically unjust or ethically just ought to be evaluated by both the ethics of care and virtue ethics, producing a decision from the dialectical synthesis of compassionate conflict developing an ethical decision from both virtue and care ethics. Conclusively, this dissertation aims to present how protection-as-ontology is best understood by synthesizing virtue and care ethics, as both theses are normative and require analysis of observable character and cognitive-behavioral traits. | |
| dc.description.department | Honors College | |
| dc.format | Text | |
| dc.format.extent | 70 pages | |
| dc.format.medium | 1 file (.pdf) | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Kirby, R. P. (2018). A state between: A caring-virtuosic argument considering decision-making before wartime (Unpublished thesis). Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10877/7251 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | philosophy | |
| dc.subject | ethics | |
| dc.subject | critical thinking | |
| dc.subject | relational ontology | |
| dc.subject | normative ethics | |
| dc.subject | virtue ethics | |
| dc.subject | The Ethics of Care | |
| dc.subject | justice | |
| dc.subject | Honors College | |
| dc.title | A State Between: A Caring-Virtuosic Argument Considering Decision-Making Before Wartime | |
| thesis.degree.department | Honors College | |
| thesis.degree.discipline | Philosophy | |
| thesis.degree.grantor | Texas State University | |
| txstate.documenttype | Honors Thesis |